Page 46 - Journal of Structural Heart Disease Volume 2, Issue 1
P. 46

Original Research Article
40
disturbances in pmVSD are similar to another re- port of 12% CRBBB [10]. CLBBB has been reported at an incidence of 3.7% [16]; however, the incidence of CLBBB was lower at 1.1% using the symmetrical VSD occluder [15].
Overall, our reported incidence of CAVB post-pm- VSD device closure is similar to that reported for sur- gical closure. Certainly the occurrence of “benign” conduction disturbances with device closure is far fewer than that seen in surgical closures.
At 54.5 months mean echocardiographic follow up, complete VSD closure was observed in 91.2% of patients, whereas a small (1–2 mm in size by trans- thoracic echo) residual shunt was found in 8.8% of patients. This is similar to other reports that noted a success rate of 92–97.6% [7, 9, 16].
Conclusion
Transcatheter closure of perimembranous and muscular VSDs has a high success rate with an
adequate safety margin. Heart block following de- vice closure is comparable to the surgical approach. Other rhythm disturbances in VSD device closure are far fewer than those of postsurgical closure. Rhythm disturbances at late follow up are uncommon but warrant close follow up.
Acknowledgments
We are very thankful to Dr. William Greer for his contributions on statistical analysis of the data in this paper. We also Thank Dr Reyaz A. Lone for his help in preparation of the manuscript.
Con ict of Interest
The authors have no con ict of interest relevant to this publication.
Comment on this Article or Ask a Question
References
1. Lewis DA, Lo redo CA, Corre-Villase- nor A, Wilson PD, Martin GR. Descrip- tive epidemiology of membranous and muscular ventricular septal defects, the Baltimore-Washington infant study. Car- diol Young. 1996;6:281–290. DOI: 10.1017/ S1047951100003905
2. Kirklin JW, Barratt-Boyes BG, eds. Cardiac Surgery, 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Liv- ingstone;1993.
3. Hardin JT, Muskett AD, Canter CE, Martin TC, Spray TL. Primary surgical closure of large ventricular septal defects in small infants. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:397–401. DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90257-5
4. Nygren A, Sunnegardh J, Berggren H. Preoperative evaluation and surgery in isolated ventricular septal defects: A 21-year perspective. Heart. 2000;83: 198–204. DOI: 10.1136/heart.83.2.198
5. Andersen HØ, de Leval MR, Tsang TV, El- liott MJ, Anderson RH, Cook AC. Is com- plete heart block after surgical closure of ventricular septum defects still an issue? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:948–956. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.04.030
6. Arora R, Trehan V, Thakur AK, Mehta V, Sengupta PP, Nigam M. Transcatheter clo- sure of congenital muscular ventricular septal defect. J Interv Cardiol. 2004;17:
109–115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-
8183.2004.09872.x
7. Holzer R, Balzer D, Cao QL, Lock K, Hijazi ZM. Device closure of muscular ven- tricular septal defects using the Amplatzer muscular ventricular septal defect occlud- er: immediate and mid-term results of a U.S. registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43: 1257–1263. DOI: 10.1016/j. jacc.2003.10.047
8. Pedra CA, Pedra SR, Esteves CA, Pontes SC Jr, Braga SL, Arrieta SR, et al. Percutaneous closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects with the Amplatzer device: technical and morphologic considerations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;61:403– 410. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10797
9. Fu YC, Bass J, Amin Z, Radtke W, Cheatham JP, Hellenbrand WE, et al. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects using the new Amplatzer membranous VSD occluder. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:319–325. DOI: 10.1016/j. jacc.2005.09.028
10. Pinto RJ, Dalvi BV, Sharma S. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects using Amplatzer asym- metric ventricular septal defect occluder: Preliminary experience with 18-month
follow up. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.
2006;68:145–152. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20813 11. Tan CA, Levi DS, Moore JW. Percutaneous Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect Associated With a Ventricu- lar Septal Aneurysm Using the Amplatzer Ductal Occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;66:427–31. DOI: 10.1002/
ccd.20499
12. Muhammad D, Ahmad Z. Safety and ef-  cacy of Amplatzer duct occluder for percutaneous closure of ventricular sep- tal defects with tunnel shape aneurysm: Medium term follow up. World J Cardio- vasc Dis. 2013;3:228–233. DOI: 10.4236/ wjcd.2013.32035
13. Koneti NR, Sreeram N, Penumatsa RR, Ar- ramraj SK. Transcatheter retrograde clo- sure of perimembranous ventricular sep- tal defects in children with the Amplatzer duct occluder II device. J Am Coll Cardi- ol. 2012;60:2421–2422. DOI: 10.1016/j. jacc.2012.08.1004
14. Tzikas A, Aguirre D, Velasco-Sanchez D, Freixa X, Alburquenque M, Khairy P, et al. Transcatheter closure of perimembra- nous ventricular septal defect with the Amplatzer® membranous VSD occluder 2: Initial world experience and one-year
Journal of Structural Heart Disease, February 2016
Volume 2, Issue 1: 35-41


































































































   44   45   46   47   48