Page 24 - Journal of Structural Heart Disease Volume 5, Issue 2

37
Original Scientific Article
7. Gleason TG, Schindler JT, Adams DH, Rear- don MJ, Kleiman NS, Caplan LR, et al. The risk and extent of neurologic events are equivalent for high-risk patients treat- ed with transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:85-96. DOI: 10.1016/j. jtcvs.2016.02.073
8. Mahtta D, Elgendy IY, Bavry AA. From Cor- eValve to Evolut PRO: reviewing the jour- ney of self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves. Cardiol Ther. 2017;6:183-192. DOI: 10.1007/s40119-017-0100-z
9. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, Miller DC, Moses JW, Tuzcu EM, et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised con- trolled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2477-2484. DOI: 10.3410/f.725395836.793523924
10. Thourani VH, Kodali S, Makkar RR, Herr- mann HC, Williams M, Babaliaros V, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in inter- mediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:2218-2225. DOI: 10.1016/j.ycar.2012.02.046
11. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Svensson LG, Kodali SK, et al. Transcathe- ter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1609-1620. DOI: 10.12968/bj- ca.2011.6.11.564a
12. Reardon M, Mieghem N, Pompa J, Kleiman NS, Søndergaard L, Mumtaz M, et al. Sur- gical or transcatheter aortic valve replace- ment in intermediate risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1321-1331. DOI: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1700456
13. Terre JA, George I, Smith CR. Pros and cons of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6:444- 452. DOI: 10.21037/acs.2017.09.15
14. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Cara- bello BA, Erwin JP, Fleisher LA, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardi- ology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135:1159-1195. DOI: 10.3410/f.727426955.793533368
15. Fornell D. An introduction to mobile C-arm x-ray systems. Imaging Technology News. April 13, 2011. Available at: https://www.it-
nonline.com/article/introduction-mobile- c-arm-x-ray-systems. Accessed November 26, 2017.
16. Aliabadi D, Pica MC, McCullough PA, Grines CL, Safian RD, O’Neill WW, et al. Rapid bedside coronary angiogra- phy with a portable fluoroscopic im- aging system. Cathet Cardiovasc Di- agn. 1997;41:449-455. DOI: 10.1002/ (sici)1097-0304(199708)41:4<449::aid- ccd26>3.0.co;2-f
17. Loria K. C-arm choice: deciding between fixed angio systems and portable C-arms. Radiology Today. March 2016. Available at: http://www.radiologytoday.net/archive/ rt0316p22.shtml. Accessed November 26, 2017.
18. Schueler BA. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: general overview of fluoroscopic imaging. RadioGraphics. 2000;20:1115-1126. DOI: 10.1148/radio- graphics.20.4.g00jl301115
19. Kleiman N. Room considerations with TAVR. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2012;8:19-21. PMID: 22891123
20. Tommaso CL, Bolman III RM, Feldman T, Bavaria J, Acker MA, Aldea G, et al. Mul- tisociety (AATS, ACCF, SCAI, and STS) expert consensus statement: operator and institutional requirements for tran- scatheter valve repair and replacement, part 1: transcatheter aortic valve replace- ment. JACC. 2012;59:2028-2042. DOI: 10.3410/f.716297902.791652843
21. Bagur R, Rodés-Cabau J, Doyle D, Laro- chellière RD, Villeneuve J, Lemieux J, et al. Usefulness of TEE as the primary imaging technique to guide transcatheter transapi- cal aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Car- diol Img. 2011;4:115-124. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcmg.2010.10.009
22. Svensson LG, Kapadia S, Rodriguez L, Tuzcu EM. Percutaneous aortic valves and imag- ing. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2011;4:125-127.
23. Bonaros N, Friedrich G, Bartel T, Müller S, Weidinger F, Wiedemann D, et al. The use of new generation mobile C-arm for major diagnostic and therapeutic proce- dures in cardiac surgery. An alternative to the hybrid room? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;60:V177. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031- 1297563
24. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons’ online STS adult cardiac surgery risk calculator. Risk model and variables - STS adult cardi- ac surgery database version 2.81. Available at: http://riskcalc.sts.org/stswebriskcalc/#/
25.
26.
27. 28.
29.
calculate. Accessed December 11, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.149 Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Weissman NJ, Monaghan MJ. Assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following TAVR: a proposal of unifying grading scheme. J Am Coll Car- diol Img. 2015;8:340-360. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcmg.2015.01.008
Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, Piaz- za N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, et al. Updated standardized endpoint defi- nitions for transcatheter aortic valve im- plantation: the valve academic research consortium-2 consensus document. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2403-2418. DOI: 10.1093/ eurheartj/ehs255
Philips. 2009. Philips Allura Xper FD20 sys- tem specifications [Brochure]. Eindhoven, Netherlands:(n.p.)
Mobile C-Arms Comparison Chart. Available at: www.itnonline.com/com- pare/69701/50442?products=2-12-20. Ac- cessed November 26, 2017.
Angiography Systems Comparison Chart. Available at: https://www.itnonline.com/ compare/69676/50362?products=7-10. Accessed November 26, 2017.
30.Seibert JA. Flat-panel detectors: how much better are they? Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36:173-181. DOI: 10.1007/s00247- 006-0208-0
31. Daneault B, Balter S, Kodali SK, Williams MR, Généreux P, Reiss GR, et al. Patient ra- diation exposure during transcatheter aor- tic valve replacement procedures. EuroIn- tervention. 2012;8:679-684. DOI: 10.4244/ eijv8i6a106
32. Signorotto P, del Vecchio A, Montorfano M, Maisano F, Giagnorio M, Bellanca R, et al. Dosimetric data and radiation risk analysis for new procedures in interven- tional cardiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;142:201-208. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ ncq208
Ahmed B. et al.
TAVR Using Portable Fluoroscopy
Cite this article as: Ahmed B, Ganesh P, Traverse M, Piekarski GM, Mauro KA, Niclou AM, Yarkoni A. Portable Versus Mounted Fluoroscopic Imag- ing During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Structural Heart Dis- ease. 2019;5(2):25-37. DOI: https://doi. org/10.12945/j.jshd.2019.023.18