Page 22 - Journal of Structural Heart Disease Volume 5, Issue 3
P. 22

61
Original Scientific Article
  257. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.009
10. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Aor- tic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echo- cardiography. Radiology. 2007;244:745-
754. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2443061127
11. Utsunomiya H, Yamamoto H, Horiguchi J, Kunita E, Okada T, Yamazato R, et al. Un- derestimation of aortic valve area in cal- cified aortic valve disease: effects of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity. Int J Cardiol. 2012;157:347-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.
ijcard.2010.12.071
12. O’Brien B, Schoenhagen P, Kapadia SR, Svensson LG, Rodriguez L, Griffin BP, et al. Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity. Circ Car- diovasc Imaging. 2011;4:566-573. DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.111.964916
13. De Vecchi C, Caudron J, Dubourg B, Pirot N, Lefebvre V, Bauer F, et al. Effect of the el- lipsoid shape of the left ventricular outflow tract on the echocardiographic assess- ment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:52- 57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.006
14. Anger T, Bauer V, Plachtzik C, Geisler T, Ga- waz MP, Oberhoff M, et al. Non-invasive and invasive evaluation of aortic valve area in 100 patients with severe aortic valves- tenosis: comparison of cardiac computed tomography with ECHO(transesophageal/ transthoracic) and catheter examination. J Cardiol. 2014;63:189-197. DOI: 10.1016/j. jjcc.2013.08.002
15. Larsen LH, Kofoed KF, Carstensen HG, Me- jdahl MR, Andersen MJ, Kjaergaard J, et al. Aortic valve area assessed with 320-detec- tor computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30:165-173. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0295-6
16. American College of C, American Heart As- sociation Task Force on Practice G, Society
of Cardiovascular A, Bonow RO, Carabel- lo BA, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the So- ciety of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:e1-148. DOI: 10.1161/cir- culationaha.106.177303
17. Rivard AL, Bartel T, Bianco RW, O’Donnell KS, Bonatti J, Dichtl W, et al. Evaluation of aortic root and valve calcifications by multi-detector computed tomography. J Heart Valve Dis. 2009;18:662-670. PMID: 20099715
18. Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M, Ko- bza R, Roos JE, Seifert B, et al. Electrocar- diographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. Radiol- ogy. 2002;225:120-128. DOI: 10.1148/radi- ol.2251011703
19. Barbanti M, Yang TH, Rodès Cabau J, Tam- burino C, Wood DA, Jilaihawi H, et al. Ana- tomical and procedural features associated with aortic root rupture during balloon-ex- pandable transcatheter aortic valve re- placement. Circulation. 2013;128:244-253. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.002947
20. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Aortic stenosis sus- pected to be severe despite low gradients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:545-551. DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.113.001375
21. Gaspar T, Adawi S, Sachner R, Asmer I, Ga- naeem M, Rubinshtein R, et al. Three-di- mensional imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on aortic valve area estimation by the continuity equation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:749-757. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.05.001
22. Saitoh T, Shiota M, Izumo M, Gurudevan SV, Tolstrup K, Siegel RJ, et al. Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimen- sional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:1626-1631. DOI: 10.1016/j.amj- card.2012.01.391
23. Koos R, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, Wildberg- er JE, Hoffmann R, Kuhl HP. Aortic valve calcification as a marker for aortic stenosis severity: assessment on 16-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1813-1818. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831813
24. CueffC,SerfatyJM,CimadevillaC,LaissyJP, Himbert D, Tubach F, et al. Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart. 2011;97:721- 726. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2010.198853
25. Greve AM, Gerdts E, Boman K, Gohl- ke-Baerwolf C, Rossebø AB, Nienaber CA, et al. Prognostic importance of atrial fibril- lation in asymptomatic aortic stenosis: The Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Steno- sis study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:72-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.09.064
26. Burup Kristensen C, Jensen JS, Sogaard P, Carstensen HG, Mogelvang R. Atrial fibrilla- tion in aortic stenosis--echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2012;10:38. DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-10-38
   Ko S. M. et al.
Aortic Valve Area Measured with CT and TTE
Cite this article as: Ko SM, Condado JF, Babaliaros V, Lerakis S, Ko Y, Stillman AE. Difference in Aortic Valve Area Mea- sured With Cardiac CT and Transthorac- ic Echocardiography. Structural Heart Disease. 2019;5(3):52=61. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.12945/j.jshd.2019.025.18









































































   20   21   22   23   24