Page 24 - Journal of Structural Heart Disease - Volume 1 Issue 1

Original Research Article
18
References
1. Pate GE, Al Zubaidi A, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, Munt BI, Webb JG. Percu- taneous closure of prosthetic paravalvu- lar leaks: Case series and review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68:528-533. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20795
2. Miller DL, Morris JJ, Schaff H V, Mullany CJ, Nishimura RA, Orszulak TA. Reoperation for aortic valve periprosthetic leakage: identi- fication of patients at risk and results of op- eration. J. Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4:160-165. PMID: 8556176
3. Hourihan M, Perry SB, Mandell VS, Keane JF, Rome JJ, Bittl JA, et al. Transcatheter umbrella closure of valvular and parazval- vular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol. 20, 1371-1377 (1992). DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90250-Q
4. Kort HW, Sharkey AM, Balzer DT. Novel use of the Amplatzer duct occluder to close perivalvar leak involving a pros- thetic mitral valve. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2004;61(4):548-551. DOI: 10.1002/ ccd.10785
5. Moscucci M, Deeb GM, Bach D, Eagle KA, Williams DM. Coil embolization of a peri- prosthetic mitral valve leak associated with severe hemolytic anemia. Circula- tion. 2001;104(16):e85-e86. DOI: 10.1161/ hc4101.096829
6. Webb JG, Pate GE, Munt BI. Percutaneous closure of an aortic prosthetic paravalvu- lar leak with an Amplatzer duct occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;65(1):69- 72. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20337
7. Hildick-Smith D, Behan MWH, De Giovanni J. Percutaneous closure of an aortic para- valvular leak via the transradial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:708- 710. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21043
8. Rihal CS, Sorajja P, Booker JD, Hagler DJ, Cabalka AK. Principles of percutaneous paravalvular leak closure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:121-130. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcin.2011.11.007
9. Cortés M, García E, García-Fernandez MA, Gomez JJ, Perez-David E, Fernández-Avilés F. Usefulness of transesophageal echocar- diography in percutaneous transcatheter repairs of paravalvular mitral regurgita- tion. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:382-386. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.08.052
10. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replace- ment with a mechanical versus a biopros- thetic valve: Final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardi- ol. 2000;36(4):1152-1158. DOI: 10.1016/ S0735-1097(00)00834-2
11. Ionescu a, Fraser a G, Butchart EG. Preva- lence and clinical significance of inciden- tal paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesoph- ageal echocardiography. Heart. 2003;89(11):1316-1321. DOI: 10.1136/ heart.89.11.1316
12. Genonia M, Franzena D, Vogta P, Seifertb B, Jennic R, Künzlia A, et al. Paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement: improved long-term survival with ag- gressive surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17(1):14-19. DOI: 10.1016/S1010- 7940(99)00358-9
13. Safi AM, Kwan T, Afflu E, Al Kamme A, Sal- ciccioli L. Paravalvular regurgitation: a rare complication following valve replacement surgery. Angiology. 2000;51:479-487. DOI: 10.1177/000331970005100605
14. Genoni M, Franzen D, Tavakoli R, Seiffert B, Graves K, Jenni R, et al. Does the morphol- ogy of mitral paravalvular leaks influence symptoms and hemolysis? J Heart Valve Dis. 2001;10:426-430. PMID: 11499584
15. Wąsowicz M, Meineri M, Djaiani G, Mit- sakakis N, Hegazi N, Xu W, et al. Early com- plications and immediate postoperative outcomes of paravalvular leaks after valve replacement surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:610-614. DOI: 10.1053/j. jvca.2011.01.012
16. Kliger C, Eiros R, Isasti G, Einhorn B, Jelnin V, Cohen H, et al. Review of surgical prosthet- ic paravalvular leaks: Diagnosis and cathe- ter-based closure. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:638- 648. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs347
17. Melacini P, Villanova C, Thiene G, Minarini M, Fasoli G, Bortolotti U, et al. Long-term echocardiographic Doppler monitoring of Hancock bioprostheses in the mitral valve position. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:1157-1163. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90048-4
18.Duvernoy WF, Gonzalez-Lavin L, Anbe DT. Spontaneous closure of paravalvu- lar leak after mitral valve replacement. Chest. 1975;68:102-104. DOI: 10.1378/ chest.68.1.102
21. Misawa Y, Saito T, Konishi H, Oki S, Kamin- ishi Y, Takahashi H, et al. When and how does nonstructural mechanical prosthetic heart valve dysfunction occur? Jpn J Tho- rac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;51:355-360. DOI: 10.1007/BF02719467
22. Gerber IL, Stewart RAH, French JK, Legget ME, Greaves SC, West TM, et al. Associa- tions between plasma natriuretic peptide levels, symptoms, and left ventricular func- tion in patients with chronic aortic regurgi- tation. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:755-758. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00849-X
23. Sutton TM, Stewart RAH, Gerber IL, West TM, Richards AM, Yandle TG, et al. Plasma natriuretic peptide levels increase with symptoms and severity of mitral regurgita- tion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:2280-2287. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00486-8
24. Kronzon I, Sugeng L, Perk G, Hirsh D, Weinert L, Fernandez MAG, et al. Re- al-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of post-operative mitral annuloplasty ring and prosthetic valve dehiscence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(17):1543-1547. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.059
25. García-Fernández MA, Cortés M, García-Ro- bles JA, Gomez de Diego JJ, Perez-David E, García E. Utility of real-time three-di- mensional transesophageal echocar- diography in evaluating the success of percutaneous transcatheter closure of mitral paravalvular leaks. J Am Soc Echo- cardiogr. 2010;23(1):26-32. DOI: 10.1016/j. echo.2009.09.028
26. De Cicco G, Russo C, Moreo A, Beghic C, Fuccia C, Gerometta P, et al. Mitral valve periprosthetic leakage: anatom- ical observations in 135 patients from a multicentre study. Eur J Cardiothora Surg. 2006;30(6):887-891. DOI: 10.1016/j. ejcts.2006.09.019
27. Zoghbi W a, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, Foster E, Gottdiener JS, Grayburn PA, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, devel- oped in conjunction. J Am Soc Echocar- diogr. 2009;22(9):975-1014; quiz 1082-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.07.013
28. Kliger C, Eiros R, Isasti G, Einhorn B, Jelnin V, Cohen H, et al. Review of surgical prosthetic paravalvular leaks: diagnosis and catheter-based closure. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(9):638-649. DOI: 10.1093/eu-
19.
20.
Ruiz CE, Jelnin V, Kronzon I, Dudiy Y, Del Valle-Fernandez R, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous clo- sure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2210-2217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.074
Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, Rihal CS. Percutaneous repair of paravalvular pros- thetic regurgitation: Acute and 30-day outcomes in 115 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(4):314-321. DOI: 10.1161/ CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.960955
Structural Heart Disease, May 2015
Volume 1, Issue 1: 9-19